Beyond Quantum: Thermodynamic Computing
Thermodynamic computing, a concept that harnesses the power of random dynamics and probabilistic physics, is being touted as a more energy-efficient alternative to quantum computing.

Quantum computing has long been heralded as the holy grail of computational power, promising to solve complex problems that are intractable for classical computers. However, the challenges of reliably building and scaling quantum computers have proven to be formidable. Despite significant investments and research efforts, the practical realization of large-scale, error-corrected quantum computers remains elusive.
Guillaume Verdon and Trevor McCourt, the founders of Extropic, a company at the forefront of this emerging field, have shifted their focus from quantum computing to the development of thermodynamic computing. In a recent YouTube video [1], they eloquently articulated their rationale for this strategic pivot.
Verdon and McCourt argue that while quantum computing holds immense potential, the manufacturing challenges involved in creating and scaling these devices are daunting. In contrast, thermodynamic computing offers a more achievable solution, particularly for probabilistic machine learning and optimization tasks.
The Principles
At its core, thermodynamic computing involves harnessing the random dynamics of a circuit to sample from probability distributions. By performing as much computation as possible natively in the probabilistic physics realm, these devices aim to minimize energy consumption while maximizing computational efficiency.
The concept is rooted in the idea of moving beyond abstract logic machines and embedding mathematical operations directly into physical processes. This approach draws parallels with quantum computing, but with a crucial distinction – thermodynamic computing can potentially be implemented using room-temperature devices, leveraging existing knowledge from the semiconductor industry.
The Potential Benefits
The advantages of thermodynamic computing are multifold. First and foremost, by embracing the inherent randomness of physical systems, these devices could significantly reduce the energy consumption associated with probabilistic computations, a crucial consideration in an era of ever-increasing data processing demands.
Additionally, the ability to leverage existing manufacturing processes and knowledge from the semiconductor industry could potentially accelerate the development and adoption of thermodynamic computing devices. This could translate into faster time-to-market and more cost-effective solutions compared to the highly specialized manufacturing requirements of quantum computers.
The Gaussian Limitation
At the core of machine learning lies the fundamental goal of accurately modeling the statistical distributions that govern natural phenomena. As Andrew Côté eloquently explains, the process begins with an initial guessed distribution, which is then iteratively shaped and refined through repeated observations and samples from the target distribution – reality itself.
The ultimate objective is to develop a model capable of accurately predicting the underlying phenomena, even for cases that have not been directly observed during the training process. This is achieved by carefully tuning the model using training and testing data, striking a delicate balance between overfitting, underfitting, and achieving practical usefulness.
While the various machine learning models and algorithms available today differ in their approaches to ingesting data, making guesses, rejecting hypotheses based on criteria, and updating the guess-making process, they share a common flaw – an over-reliance on Gaussian distributions.
The Gaussian distribution, often represented by the familiar bell curve, is ubiquitous in nature due to the Central Limit Theorem. It serves as the default assumption for how phenomena behave, acting as the "vanilla ice cream of probabilities" [2]. However, this reliance on Gaussian distributions can potentially limit the ability of machine learning models to accurately capture the nuances and complexities of real-world phenomena.
The Promise
It is here that thermodynamic computing presents a promising alternative. By harnessing the inherent randomness of physical systems and embedding mathematical operations directly into physical processes, thermodynamic computing devices could potentially overcome the limitations imposed by the over-reliance on Gaussian distributions.
By embracing the full spectrum of probability distributions inherent in the natural world, these devices could more accurately model and predict complex phenomena, unlocking new frontiers in machine learning and artificial intelligence.
Extropic's Vision and Roadmap
Extropic, the company spearheading this paradigm shift, has ambitious plans for the future of thermodynamic computing. According to Verdon and McCourt, they are working on a "light paper" that will further elucidate their approach and provide a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying principles.
Their long-term goal is to demonstrate the efficiency and speed of thermodynamic computing by creating a room-temperature, mass-produced chip [1]. This chip could potentially enable a wide range of applications, from machine learning and optimization tasks to probabilistic algorithms for businesses operating in low-data regimes.
The Broader Implications
The potential impact of thermodynamic computing extends far beyond the realm of computing itself. If successful, this technology could play a pivotal role in enabling the next generation of artificial intelligence (AI) systems, extending the boundaries of what is possible with current computing architectures.
Verdon and McCourt envision a future where thermodynamic computing could contribute to extending Moore's law for AI and probabilistic computing, enabling continued progress in these fields despite the looming limitations of traditional computing approaches [2].
Moreover, the impact of thermodynamic computing could ripple across various industries, from finance and logistics to healthcare and scientific research, enabling more efficient and effective solutions to complex optimization and decision-making problems.
References
[1] Thermodynamic Computing: Better than Quantum? | Guillaume Verdon and Trevor McCourt, Extropic - YouTube (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwDWOtFNsKQ)
[2] Twitter: https://twitter.com/Andercot/status/1767252816660471878